Thanks for your note, Dr. J. It was certainly worth asking the question – precisely because of what you pointed out: the popularity of his practice. There’s enough buzz out there to provide just the right amount of confusion. I suppose it’s like the latest buzz about the “miracle cure” for MS. It might be valid, but without the requisite studies, it remains just as you said: theory.
Your statement is what I was looking for: “there has been no definable research that validates his theory, or any study that has replicated his beliefs”. That’s exactly it. ’nuff said. I’ll turn that stone back over and wander off….. 
Thanks again!
REPORT ABUSE